With deniers believing in Victorian Era Science, conspiracy belief inevitably follows

There is nothing at all logically inconsistent with finding that most climate change deniers sincerely believe that talk of global warming is a scam to enable one group of people take over the world by subterfuge.

That strange belief logically follows from their continuing belief in the equally strange - and scientifically disproven - axioms of Victorian Era science.

They are, in a phrase, "People of the First Law" , when the 21st century's leading (tenured/peer-reviewed) basic scientists are all  "People of the Second Law".

Thermodynamics , dear Watson : the two sides of the climate change debate are fighting over nothing more than the human consequences of assigning differing priorities to the two Laws of Thermodynamics !

Majority of deniers think Watermelons, not Jewish families, are behind Climate Change

Some deniers may think that conspiracy group consists of old world Jewish "banking families", but the vast majority of deniers think the actual group planning a world takeover on the backs of a bogus claim of a warming planet are the so called "watermelon conspiracy".

After "Our Side" won the Cold War in the early 1990s, deniers explain, "The Red Side" (not at all to be confused with the Red States - they are the good guys) cheated by just pretending to accept defeat.

But what it actually did was paint a new colour all over itself by expressing a sudden new "green" interest in saving the environment while still secretly planning to dominate humanity via a One World Government scheme, based on old "red" socialist-communist values.

Voila ! "The Watermelon Conspiracy" : green on the outside and red on the inside.

Hence the election of Obama-the-birther, some deniers claim ( shout out to the Viscount !), because "we all know how them there colored boys love ther watermelon".

Along with straight razor fighting and beatin' their gal : yep, its the Era of  "The Coon Song Redux" .

And why not ? Because the science of the deniers is also from that long ago era of more than a century ago - might as well be consistent.

Belief in the priority of the First Law of Thermodynamics sees nature as a largely static backdrop to the dynamic activities of humanity : the climate literally can't change,  can't do more than merely oscillate within a narrow range, back and forth or up and down, around a fixed, eternal, central equilibrium.

If you are over the age of sixty and took any geology in your science education at high school or university, you might recognize this as geology's all-ruling DOGMA, until very, very recently : Sir Charles Lyell's Uniformitarianism.

Expressed in slightly different forms, it dominated all science and in fact all human thought until well after 1945 and the uniformitarian debacle of WWII.

In mainstream Economics and in Darwinian Biology, this mid-Victorian scientific delusion still does dominate.

And of course, in the minds of  the deniers. Most of them are old enough to have the genuine excuse of claiming that it was, after all,  the cutting edge theory of its day at the high school where they last encountered the formal study of science.

With Nature passive and yet Reality highly active, believers in the First Law are almost forced to credit all change in the climate to just two things : a claim that these large and long term changes in our climate are in fact just temporary and local, if you view them from a long enough and distant enough perceptive, like that of say Simon-Pierre LaPlace in his executive suite high above the Universe.

Or that some group of humans, credited as a consequence of the First Law with virtually unlimited powers of will and mind power, have managed to fool all other humans into believing in a delusion : the delusion that the climate - and Mother Nature herself - can actually change.

Deniers sincerely - and consistently following from incorrect axioms - logically believe it is not they but the rest of humanity that is deluded.

As I have always claimed, all debate and all conflict is over initial axioms and nothing else......

Australia's best known climate denier,Jo Nova, sees "banksters" behind every climate change warning

Jo Nova

The husband and wife denier team of Jo Nova and Dave Evans are superstars of the climate denying demi-world, not just in their native Australia but everywhere in the world where the pure Anglo Saxon tongue is still celebrated.

Dave is as blunt as Galileo Movement manager Malcolm Roberts : climate change is a conspiracy put up by  Jewish banking families like the Rothschilds.

Dear Jo, the distaff denier, is of the gentler sex and settles on just blaming it on the banksters (ethnicity and religion of which is left undefined) and upon "fiat" money, that brand of money made famous by Ron Paul and his ilk.

Its an intellectual and emotional tussle as old as the modern banking system.

The fight is between those citizens who see paper money as merely a more compact versions of regular legal contracts such as their own mortgage and those who see paper money as flim-flamery and financial alchemy : "fiat money".

Most of us intuitively sense that the words on the back of old money stating "X will pay bearer $20 in gold on demand" was some sort of contract between the issuer of the note and anyone who accepted it.

As if when an Albanian teenager freely offered to buy your copy of the first Beatles album in Albanian currency at the official artificially high government-set exchange rate, you were equally free to decline to accept her offer but counter-offer the suggestion she pay you $10 in  good old American greenbacks instead.

Yes the Albanian government did issue its bank notes and set an "official" exchange rate by "fiat", but most of us can see we are equally free to reject the fiat and refuse to do business on those terms.

We sense that it takes two to have a meeting of minds and to form a contract:  an Albanian and you.

But a significant percentage of us, all throughout history, and in every nation, has refused to see money that way.

They represent, even in peaceful and prosperous times, about 15% of the voting population.

The fact that they are paranoid and suspicious about banks and money is really incidental : they are paranoid and suspicious about nearly everything and everyone . Always have been, always will be.

Two paranoias for the price of one : climate change and banksters

The same 15% is also highly suspicious about reports of global warming and man-made climate change, so it was only a matter of time before they happily put two of their favourite paranoias together.

True they could have blamed immigrants, refugees, blacks, aboriginals or homo-sex-uals for climate change but frankly this seemed , well, too global for these people to pull off .

"Let's blame stick to blaming them for non-white collar crime and rising drug use in schools."

No, only one tiny minority ethnic group has traditionally been regarded as having the moxie to pull this sort of global conspiracy off : Jews. In particular , Jewish banking families.

International banking firms are actually quite new; we have all seen those American movies where every small town has its own banker, who owns and operates a tiny one branch bank - by law.

Voters never wanted or trusted big banks and tried hard to limit their operation to one tiny geography or perhaps just one part of the overall banking industry.

But today some giant banks can and do operate all over the world : truly international. But unfortunately these various big banks aren't owned by any one somebody : rather a few million people own their shares : directly or through pension or mutual funds.

Bit hard to keep secret a plot by three million shareholders who don't know each other from Adam.

But in the old days, families of bankers did neatly sidestep the rules that restricted banks to one nation or one activity.

Brother X in Germany did investment banking inside Germany, his cousin Y did the same in England while uncle Z did retail banking in Australia and so on.

And yes, many of these real-life closely-knit banking families were Jewish.

But they weren't in fact tremendously powerful, partly because there was widespread suspicion of them, both as Jews and as international bankers .

The truly powerful cabals in the pre-war era were world-wide industrial cartels run by WASPS , but even there there were always cartel members tempted to go off the range, so to speak.

The paranoid 15%, a competitive and entrepreneurial lot, can't get along with each other but somehow they can't accept that other people at least as competitive and as entrepreneurial as themselves, mightn't stay united in a cabal for very long either.

Climate change acceptors should never be reduced to discussing or debating science with these 15 percenters ,  they should be dissecting the deniers' free-floating paranoia instead .

Turn over their stones and you'll find an endless list of objects for their year-round "HATE WEEK"  : climate change is but one of many......